The last paper explored the history of the term NIMBY (“Not In My Back Yard”) as a creation of corporate chemical companies to demean and marginalize local opposition to industrialization, and it moves beyond that phrase to the declaration of “Not in anybody’s backyard” — the idea that no one should have to live with the environmental destruction, water pollution, toxic fallout and other problems of being the site of an industrial project.
This next paper uses the analogy of Moneyball, starring Brad Pitt, to address the role Big Green, aka Environmental Non-profit Industrial Complex, plays in the destruction of life’s earth support systems. Big Green is more interested in proving it can play by the rules created by those who destroy life on earth than it is in actually stopping the destruction. We need to reject Big Green in order to focus on what matters: stopping the destruction. Communities do this in two ways:
- Banning activities that violate their right to clean air, water and a sustainable energy future and
- Recognizing through law that nature has rights of its own.
We can easily translate this community rights frame into a more general human rights activist frame as well, by locally recognizing human rights that existing laws do not recognize and by banning activities that violate any human rights. For example, US law allows domestic police forces to use substances banned from warfare in international law on its own population. Communities can recognize the right to be free from use of excessive force and police brutality and ban such practices locally, changing the way that policing happens in their community.
Read more: We have a static link to these papers from our Resources page.